• Contact
  • About
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
East Anglia Bylines
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Politics Blog
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • East Anglia
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Politics Blog
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • East Anglia
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines

East Anglian MPs slam pylons proposals in Parliamentary debate

Local MPs are opposing National Grid plans to run 180km of cabling across the region, for failing to present a subsea alternative.

Jenny RhodesbyJenny Rhodes
July 20, 2022
in Energy, Farming, Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins
A A
pylons in farmland

Pylons on farmland near Valley Farm Lodge. Photo by Simon Mortimer via Geograph (cc-by-sa-2.0)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In Parliament many East Anglian MPs spoke at a debate on Tuesday 19 July about National Grid’s pylon plans. You can watch it here.

MPs addressed their concerns to Greg Hands, Minister of State at the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, in the hope that the Government could be persuaded to take control of proposals by National Grid (NG) for 180 km of cable on 50m pylons through Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex.

Local MPs speak

Sir Bernard Jenkin, Mark Francois, James Cartlidge, Alex Burghart, Richard Bacon, Jo Churchill, Peter Aldous and Jerome Mayhew all expressed strong views about National Grid’s ‘East Anglia GREEN’ plan. Most want the consultation re-run.

Sir Bernard Jenkin MP
Sir Bernard Jenkin MP. Photo by David Woodfall at Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-3.0

Several references were made to the irony of conducting the renewables debate on what was the hottest day ever recorded in the UK, which Peter Aldous said was ‘snapshot of our future’ if we delay reducing carbon emissions.

Sir Bernard said that he’d received more letters from constituents on pylons than on any other issue. He spoke passionately about potential social, archeological and environmental impacts of the pylons, which bring no local benefits as the energy is destined for London.

Most MPs said that it had been presented to residents as a single method proposal, with no alternatives to the overland route; in short, as a fait accompli.

‘Who is responsible?’

There were fervent pleas of ‘Who is accountable?’ due to not knowing who to approach for a comprehensive review.

Many MPs made the point that in North East England and Scotland, for example, the views of, and effect on, communities had been considered, and subsea routes had been chosen instead of overland. Alex Burghart asked for the evidence used when selecting the single East Anglian route. 

Jo Churchill spoke for farmers whose land would be severely affected, observing that the UK relies on East Anglia for a significant proportion of food production, which could be reduced if agricultural land was given over to construction. She also described a nature reserve of rare acid grassland which may be decimated. She was critical of NG’s public consultation questionnaire for leading, closed questions such as ‘Do you support green energy?’

Out-of-date regulatory framework

Sir Bernard described how plans are hamstrung by the requirements of a decades-old regulatory framework, which needs an urgent overhaul. Peter Aldous observed that the plans are in accordance with the existing framework and he felt that NG could therefore not have consulted on different proposals. However, James Cartlidge remarked on a subsea route (Sealink 1) approved to connect East Anglia and Kent. Richard Bacon asked for a new regime to be rapidly accelerated so that GREEN could be formulated under improved requirements.

Offshore assessment

As James Cartlidge observed, East Anglians seem to be living in a ‘parallel universe’. He later mentioned that NG are this summer undertaking a detailed offshore alternative assessment; therefore the one-method consultation should be re-opened.

There was apprehension about the possibility of lawyers and a judicial review if this plan is not ‘got right’, because this would delay energy transmission for years when the need is urgent.

Greg Hands MP
Greg Hands MP. Photo by Chris McAndrew at Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-3.0

Labour’s Shadow Minister for Climate Change & Net Zero, Kerry McCarthy, agreed that everyone there wanted net zero (although she was somewhat doubtful about Saffron Walden’s MP, Kemi Badenoch, after hearing her contributions to the leadership contest debates). Kemi Badenoch was not present.

The Minister’s response

In answer, Greg Hands described the urgent need for more renewables – 50 Gigawatts by 2030 – and how infrastructure must be quickly built. Energy is being harvested quicker than transmission methods can be constructed. Offshore cables have the capacity to carry two GW, but output will be six GW, so maybe three cables would be needed? He expected that farmers would receive compensation for land impact and lost crop production. He spoke generally, making no commitments, but agreed to further meetings. In Sir Bernard’s brief closing response, he was unsatisfied. He said the Minister was still ‘disclaiming responsibility’ for NG, unlike with roads or rail, and that environmental impacts aren’t prioritised or mitigated as with HS2. He asserted that the government must stop the ‘runaway train’ threatening to wreck communities’.


More about the pylon plan

Pylons at Aldringham, Suffolk
Anglia

Shock as National Grid proposes 180km of new pylons across East Anglia

byAnna Damski
May 15, 2022
Tags: EnergyGreen energyNational Grid
Previous Post

Cambridge protestors condemn Rwanda deportation policy

Next Post

Sizewell C gets green light despite Planning Inspectorate’s recommendation

Jenny Rhodes

Jenny Rhodes

Jenny Rhodes lives in Essex and taught in London for many years, specialising in Literacy and English as an Additional Language. As well as education, she has a particular interest in gender equality and environmental issues. Jenny is a member of the EAB editorial team.

Related Posts

Astro turf dumped in a big pile
Environment

Astroturf pitch plans refused in ‘test case’ over health fears

byEast Anglia Bylines
December 8, 2023
Two people approach passport control at the UK Border Control, Heathrow.
Brexit

Who’s afraid of freedom of movement?

byAndrew Levi
December 8, 2023
View of a series of pylons marching across a valley in England
Anglia

Hope sparks for end of pylon controversy

byEast Anglia Bylines
December 7, 2023
People demonstrating against poverty. One banner says "Fight poverty, not the poor."
Economics

We can eliminate poverty: but we have decided not to

byProf Richard Murphy
December 7, 2023
Farmer workers in norfolk best over harvesting root crops
East Anglia

When rural Norfolk fought back

byStephen McNair
December 6, 2023
Next Post
CGI of Sizewell C plant

Sizewell C gets green light despite Planning Inspectorate's recommendation

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

Astro turf dumped in a big pile

Astroturf pitch plans refused in ‘test case’ over health fears

December 8, 2023
Two people approach passport control at the UK Border Control, Heathrow.

Who’s afraid of freedom of movement?

December 8, 2023
A statue on a tomb of a woman leaning on the tomb, weeping.

Grief Awareness Week: resources for support and healing

December 7, 2023
View of a series of pylons marching across a valley in England

Hope sparks for end of pylon controversy

December 7, 2023
People demonstrating against poverty. One banner says "Fight poverty, not the poor."

We can eliminate poverty: but we have decided not to

December 7, 2023
Grape harvest, from the book of hours of the Duke of Berry. Some workers are bending over harvesting, other are chatting, one is tasting the grapes.

Cambridge – Town and Gown unto death

December 6, 2023

MOST READ

Climate crisis. Houses on the cliff edge at Hemsby

“Sorry, you are on your own!” climate crisis hits Norfolk

December 3, 2023
PM Rishi Sunak standing at the dispatch box during Prime Ministers Questions

Pecksniff: Is Sunak losing his marbles?

December 2, 2023
Hundreds of rioters push police back. Dozens of police are wearing helmets, hi-viz jackets and riot gear.

Polish lessons for the UK: stopping the far right

December 1, 2023
A hand holding a large bundle of £50 notes

EU to regulate political ads as UK welcomes ‘dark money’

December 4, 2023

Tags

Activism Anglian Water Brexit Business Cartoons Climate Community Conservatives COP26 Crime Democracy Economics Economy Elections Environment EU Farming Government Health History International Women's Day Labour Law Letters Local elections 2023 National Grid Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Poverty Sewage Social care Tax Trade Ukraine VAWG Welfare Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines

© 2023 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Politics Blog
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • East Anglia
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

DONATE

© 2023 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In