• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9771
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
East Anglia Bylines
Advertisement
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines
Home Lifestyle Community

Why councils can’t say no to the 24-hour gambling dens plaguing high streets

A broken law forces councils to approve gambling venues – even when they know harm will follow

Oliver Rouane-Williams by Oliver Rouane-Williams
28 July 2025
in Community, Devolution, Health, Local government
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Game Nation gambling shop in Ipswich

Image © Oliver Rouane-Williams/ Ipswich.co.uk, reproduced with kind permission.

Share on Bluesky

Last week’s planning committee meeting at Ipswich Borough Council laid bare a fundamental problem with how we regulate the “adult gaming centres” taking over our high streets. Councillor Jane Riley stood up for her constituents, warning that a fourth 24-hour casino would harm vulnerable people. Planning officers acknowledged her concerns. Then they approved it anyway.

This wasn’t incompetence or indifference – it was the law working exactly as designed. The 2005 Gambling Act includes an “aim to permit” clause that requires councils to favour approval unless they can prove harm. In practice, this means the operators hold all the cards whilst communities are left to prove a negative.

An impossible burden of proof

The Admiral Slots application perfectly illustrates this rigged game. The venue already had a 24-hour premises licence from November 2022 but was restricted to 07:00-00:00 hours by planning conditions. The company simply had to show no noise complaints had been received – a remarkably low bar for operating gambling machines around the clock in a town centre.

Meanwhile, residents and councillors opposing the venue faced an impossible burden of proof. How do you demonstrate that vulnerable people will be harmed by 24-hour access to machines designed to be addictive? How do you quantify the social cost of clustering four always-open casinos within walking distance of each other?

A national problem

This isn’t just an Ipswich problem. Across England, councils are watching helplessly as adult gaming centres proliferate in their most deprived areas. The Guardian reported that betting and gaming revenues hit a record £11.5bn last year, with adult gaming centres contributing £623m – up 11% in just one year.

Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, captured the frustration perfectly: “These are high-stakes gambling venues, often open around the clock, targeting some of the most vulnerable in our communities.” Yet when councils try to protect those communities, they find themselves constrained by laws written for a different era.

In May, Peterborough MP Andrew Pakes used PMQs to call on the government to take urgent action to address the proliferation of betting shops in Peterborough and across the country. “I have heard too often from residents and businesses sharing their concerns about the impact of these outlets on the vibrancy and safety of our city and it’s public spaces,” he said.

He added: “Nearly half of betting shops and gambling stores are in the 20% of places that are struggling the most.” He called on the Prime Minister to ask his departments to meet him and campaigners to discuss ways that local communities can take back control of their high streets.

The fight for reform

More than 30 councils, led by Brent and backed by Labour MPs, are demanding reform of the “aim to permit” rule. A recent government white paper on devolution hints at giving councils stronger licensing powers, but campaigners fear these measures may be watered down or dropped entirely.

The trade body Bacta warns that changing the rules would create “legal uncertainty” for businesses. But what about the moral certainty that communities should have a meaningful say in what happens on their high streets?

A flawed system that misses the real issue

Not all gambling is inherently harmful, and adult gaming centres do operate within legal frameworks with age restrictions and some consumer protections. Planning officers were technically correct that no evidence of specific harm had been documented from this particular venue.

But this misses the point entirely.

The current system forces councils to wait for harm to occur before they can act, rather than preventing it in the first place. It prioritises the profits of gambling operators over the wellbeing of communities.

Ipswich now has four 24-hour gambling venues clustered in its town centre, not because residents want them, but because 20-year-old laws make it nearly impossible to say no. Until we reform these rules, communities across Britain will continue to watch powerlessly as their high streets are colonised by an industry that thrives on addiction and despair.

If you’re worried about your own or someone else’s gambling, free and confidential support is available. Contact the National Gambling Helpline 24 hours a day on 0808 8020 133, or visit their website for advice, tools and live chat.

This article by ipswich.co.uk is republished under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Read the original here.


More from East Anglia Bylines

Previous Post

Politics isn’t tribal anymore – teenagers take a whole new view

Next Post

As pension age creeps up, more time off when young could be tempting

Oliver Rouane-Williams

Oliver Rouane-Williams

Oliver is the founder and editor of ipswich.co.uk. He spent 15 years growing some of the UK's largest and most influential local and national news and media companies, before packing it all in to start Ipswich.co.uk in 2024. It is is a "free and fiercely independent local news publication for Ipswich". It's published by Anglia Ventures, a media company founded by Oliver to provide an alternative to incumbent media operators in the region.

Related Posts

External view of County Hall Norwich, a typical 1960s 'brutalist'-style concrete and glass office block
Democracy

A stormy start for Norfolk’s new chief officer

by Stephen McNair
2 September 2026
This image shows a large radio telescope antenna at the Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory near Cambridge.
Anglia

Behind closed doors: discover Cambridge’s hidden spaces this September

by East Anglia Bylines
30 August 2026
Three identical images of Des Watts. Between each image is an arrow signifying movement and above each image is one of three logos, the first is Reform UK, the second is Advance UK and the third is the Conservatives.
Local government

Conservatives lost a seat to Reform – now they have it anyway

by John Elworthy
28 August 2026
Proposed new euro banknote designs featuring European cultural figures, birds and natural landscapes.
Community

Euro banknotes: a chance to be bold about European identity

by Niall Ó Conghaile
28 August 2026
Older man driving forklift
Economics

Raising the state pension age: Who will lose out?

by East Anglia Bylines
20 August 2026
Next Post
The backs of an elderly couple sitting on a park bench enjoying the view of autumn trees

As pension age creeps up, more time off when young could be tempting

SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Tags

Activism Art Brexit Cartoons Christmas Climate Community Conservation Conservatives Democracy Economy Elections Environment EU Farming General Election 2024 Government Health History Labour Letters Local government Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Polling Pollution Poverty Renewables Sewage Social care Something for the weekend Tax Trump Ukraine Voting Wealth Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

Crowdfunder

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771