• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9771
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
East Anglia Bylines
Advertisement
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines
Home News

Alarm as ‘explosives’ ship dumps cargo offshore then returns to port

A ship refused entry to other countries was welcomed into Gt Yarmouth, and has caused anger by dumping part of what may be its hazardous cargo offshore

Malcolm Lynn by Malcolm Lynn
21 November 2024
in News, Norfolk, Transport
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
MV Ruby berthed at Great Yarmouth port

MV Ruby berthed at Great Yarmouth. Photo © Luke Martin Photography. Used with permission

Share on Bluesky

A ship which caused controversy and alarm by putting into Great Yarmouth harbour with a cargo of thousands of tons of potentially explosive fertiliser has now caused further anger by discharging part of it offshore.

The Russian ship MV Ruby first grabbed the news headlines earlier this month. It had incurred damage by running aground in bad weather, but had been refused entry into Lithuania, Denmark and Norway. Instead, it docked at Great Yarmouth, and concerns were raised as to why, when other countries had refused entry, Britain was prepared to take her.

The Ruby’s cargo was 20,000 tons of ammonium nitrate, which is covered by the Control of Major Accident Hazard regulations, (COMAH). Ammonium nitrate is well-known as a potentially explosive compound, with a dramatic history.

The cargo has an explosive history

An explosion of 30 tonnes of ammonium nitrate fertiliser at a plant in the town of West in Texas in 2013 left 15 people dead and 160 injured. Explosions in Tianjin in 2015 and in Beirut in 2020 both claimed the lives of hundreds of people and left thousands injured and homeless.

An explosion at Texas City in 1947 was on a ship, the SS Grandcamp, and the effects included a 15ft high tsunami as well as the disastrous blast. The vessel was carrying 2,300 tonnes of ammonium nitrate. The death toll was between 500 and 600 people and thousands were injured. Windows were shattered up to 40 miles away and the ship’s 1.5 tonne anchor was found two miles away.

Because of these dangers, there are well-established procedures for handling it safely. It has not been possible to access Britain’s up-to-date regulations in detail, since the COMAH documents are not in the public domain – partly because they could be seen as handbooks telling terrorists or a hostile power exactly what to target.

But one of the principles of COMAH is that the operator of the site must include details of the “worst case scenario” that might occur, in their submission to the Health and Safety Executive. 

Reassurances on danger, but no detail

The operator also has to provide the H&SE with a detailed assessment showing that they have taken steps to ensure that risk of major accidents is as low as reasonably practicable, which will include descriptions of the inherent safety of their operation and the measures taken to prevent, control and mitigate major accidents.

The H&SE would need to know about the inherent safety of the operation and the preventative measures being taken, to be satisfied that the risk had been reduced as far as possible.

The port gave reassurances, but without detail for reasons already set out above. It was reported that the vessel was being unloaded, in order that the cargo could be moved to another vessel, the MV Zimrida, which is moored at an adjacent berth.

MV Ruby entering Great Yarmouth outer harbour steered by two tugs
MV Ruby approaching Great Yarmouth outer harbour
MV Ruby arriving at Great Yarmouth harbour
Photos of the MV Ruby approaching Great Yarmouth’s outer harbour © Luke Martin Photography. Used with permission

Contaminated cargo dumped offshore

But the story took a new turn when the Ruby left harbour last week, apparently to discharge hundreds of tonnes of contaminated fertiliser offshore. The move has infuriated conservationists and fishermen – this is the fishing season for herring. Reassurances have been given that ammonium nitrate disperses naturally and will leave no trace, but this is potentially misleading. The dispersal in seawater would reduce any risk of explosion, but there is a risk to the marine environment.

Richard Goffin, port director at Great Yarmouth, sought to reassure the public by stressing that the harbour were in consultation with all relevant public authorities. But one of those who should be consulted, Norfolk County Council, has made it clear that it is alarmed at what is happening.

Norfolk County Council leader Kay Mason Billig says: “On behalf of the people of Yarmouth, we urge the government to halt the return of the MV Ruby.” In a further joint statement with the leader of Great Yarmouth Borough Council, she added: “It should never have come in the first place, due to the potential risk of a major explosion that could have affected residents and businesses across Great Yarmouth.”

But the government insists it has no control over the matter, and the decision is purely commercial, between the port authority and the ship’s owners.

With thanks to Luke Martin, based in Great Yarmouth, who specialises in aerial photography. You can follow him on Facebook and Instagram.


Outfall pipe with sewage flowing into a river
Environment

Government grasps (part of) the water problem

by Stephen McNair
21 November 2024
Infographics from Easyfundraising

We are registered with easyfundraising! 8,000 brands will donate to us for free every time you use it.

It’s super quick and easy to SIGN UP, and will never cost you anything whatsoever. It’s FREE for you and HUGE for us!

Tags: Environment
Previous Post

Government grasps (part of) the water problem

Next Post

Tenant farmers’ survival on the brink

Malcolm Lynn

Malcolm Lynn

Malcolm lives in Huntingdonshire, where he is a member of the local Liberal Democrats. Before moving to Huntingdonshire he lived in East Yorkshire, where he was one of the leaders of a successful cross-party campaign to prevent the building of a waste incinerator. Now retired, Malcolm is a Chartered Chemical Engineer and a Chartered Environmentalist. He has extensive experience of assurance of technical safety in process industries.

Related Posts

View, looking across gardens to the outside of a Danish hospital - a modern, low-rise grey and white building
Economics

Denmark versus UK: which country gets more health for their money?

by Subhash Pokhrel
8 September 2026
Cartoon of a hospital ward crowded with structural props and buckets catching leaks, as a nurse tells a patient: “I’m afraid it’s more bad news, Mr Smith – you’ve got a parking ticket.”
Health

Will King’s Lynn win a new hospital but lose its A&E?

by East Anglia Bylines
7 September 2026
Nigel Farage stands between an image promoting Channel 4’s undercover Reform investigation and the Bylines Network webinar, with Clacton Pier in the background.
News

As Channel 4 investigated Reform’s funding, Bylines was debating how to clean up politics

by East Anglia Bylines
4 September 2026
External view of County Hall Norwich, a typical 1960s 'brutalist'-style concrete and glass office block
Democracy

A stormy start for Norfolk’s new chief officer

by Stephen McNair
2 September 2026
A flying trapeze troupe of wo girls and two men who are the catchers. All wearing purple leotards. One girl being held, one flying against a stary big top.
Culture

A new era of flying trapeze in Great Yarmouth

by Kate Moore
1 September 2026
Next Post
Pigs in pasture

Tenant farmers' survival on the brink

SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Tags

Activism Art Brexit Cartoons Christmas Climate Community Conservation Conservatives Democracy Economy Elections Environment EU Farming General Election 2024 Government Health History Labour Letters Local government Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Polling Pollution Poverty Renewables Sewage Social care Something for the weekend Tax Trump Ukraine Voting Wealth Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

Crowdfunder

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771