• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9771
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
East Anglia Bylines
Advertisement
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines
Home News Brexit

Families to be split as deliberate government policy

‘Just the rich can do it’: research shows how immigration income requirements devastate families

Prof Katharine Charsley by Prof Katharine Charsley
13 December 2023
in Brexit, Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Overhead sign at heathrow saying "UK Border" with an arrow pointing ahead

Photo credit: David McKelvey via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Share on Bluesky

The government has announced a host of new restrictions aimed at cutting net migration to the UK. Headline announcements include increasing the salary requirements for skilled foreign workers from £26,200 to £38,700, and banning health and care workers from bringing family dependants to the UK.

In the fine print is a doubling of the minimum income requirement (MIR) for family visas to £38,700. This means that many British citizens will be unable to bring their non-British spouse or partner to the UK. If implemented, it will cause the separation of thousands of couples and of children and parents.

The UK already has the second-most restrictive family immigration regime in Europe, if not the world. The MIR was first introduced to the UK immigration rules in 2012 at £18,600 per annum. At that time, this was above the income of 47% of the UK adult population overall, and an even higher proportion of women, young people, some ethnic groups and those outside south-east England.

Its impact on families was devastating. By 2015, an estimated 15,000 children had been affected because the family couldn’t meet the requirements for reunification in Britain. Foreign parents remained stuck overseas (with or without their children), and many thousands of children were separated from them.

Although average wages have since increased, problems remain. The requirement is a minimum, with higher sums needed if the application includes children. Applicants must show that they have earned this salary for at least six months, meaning that if someone only recently met the threshold (through a new job or promotion) they would still have to wait months until their family could join them.

There is an alternative route to meet the financial requirements through cash savings, but it is prohibitively high at £62,500.

As recently as February 2023, a House of Lords inquiry criticised the family migration system as “at odds with the Government’s commitment to family life”. The inquiry recommended making the income requirement more flexible and advised against any increase.

Who will this affect?

The median salary for UK full-time employees is £34,963, so well over half will not meet the new threshold. Those aged 22-29, an age when many relationships are formed, earn even less – £30,328 for men and £27,937 for women.

Some key occupations earn much less. The care worker and home care median wage is £23,409. While migrant care workers will be exempt from the new salary threshold, care workers who are British citizens (or long term residents) will be unable to apply for family members to join them in the UK.

The government says the new requirement will ensure people bringing dependants to the UK can support them financially. But, unlike in 2012, the Migration Advisory Committee (a body of experts set up by the government to advise on immigration matters) has not been asked to evidence this claim.

Two passports - one British, the other American
Photo credit: Karen Storey

The argument makes little sense to people unable to work full time because of childcare or other responsibilities, forced to live alone or as single parents, without their partner to share financial and childcare responsibilities.

We have conducted extensive research with families and couples kept apart by the UK immigration system. One of our participants, Sophia, and her husband had been living overseas but agreed that they would relocate to Britain because of political instability in his country. However, due to the minimum income requirement, she had to come alone with their daughter.

Sophia found herself torn between the needs of her child, deeply distressed by separation from her father, and working long hours to meet the threshold. With the new MIR, their separation will very likely have been made permanent.

The increase in the threshold is staggering, and will be crushing for those hoping to reunite their families. Imagine having finally secured the childcare and job you need to bring your partner over, only to find the goalposts moved not just marginally, but beyond most people’s earning capacity.

Keeping families apart

Mixed nationality relationships are common in “global” Britain – in the year to September 2023, 65,278 people obtained a visa to join a British partner. One in 25 married or cohabiting couples in Britain have one UK-born and one EU-born partner.

UK-EU couples now fall under the immigration system, and will be among the many people affected by the new requirements. Our Brexit Couples project is researching the experience of these couples, uncovering their distress, delay, expense and frustration with the UK immigration system. As one of our respondents noted: “It feels like some sort of financial injustice, just the rich can do it, basically.”

The new threshold will be devastating for any British citizen who falls in love with a foreign partner. It is difficult to assess how many people will be affected.

Many will never apply (particularly after recent fee increases) and either move abroad or endure indefinite separation. Those who can afford to will appeal refusals on human rights grounds. They may well succeed, but only with more expense and even longer separation from their families.

The political consequences also cannot be predicted. Many more people will become aware of the draconian family migration rules when they or someone they care about is affected. The proposal may well turn out to be less popular than the government hopes.

The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


More from East Anglia Bylines

Migrant small boat
Party politics

What would a decent immigration policy look like?

by Stephen McNair
10 July 2023
Tags: Immigration
Previous Post

Sejmflix fever sweeps Poland: political drama is centre stage

Next Post

Full disclosure: should you trust us with Artificial Intelligence?

Prof Katharine Charsley

Prof Katharine Charsley

Katharine Charsley is Professor of Migration Studies at the School of Sociology Politics and International Studies at the University of Bristol. She specialises in the area of gender, family and migration, particularly transnational marriage. She is currently Project Lead of the ESRC-funded project 'UK-EU Couples after Brexit: migrantization and the UK family immigration regime' at Brexit Couples

Related Posts

Parliamentary demonstration on assisted dying
Health

Assisted dying II: the return of the bill

by East Anglia Bylines
10 September 2026
Nigel Farage stands between an image promoting Channel 4’s undercover Reform investigation and the Bylines Network webinar, with Clacton Pier in the background.
News

As Channel 4 investigated Reform’s funding, Bylines was debating how to clean up politics

by East Anglia Bylines
4 September 2026
A crowd with one person in the foreground wearing a red baseball cap the wrong way around with Make America Great Again embroidered on it
Democracy

The MAGA paradox of good people and bad politics

by Guy Anthony Ayres
3 September 2026
External view of County Hall Norwich, a typical 1960s 'brutalist'-style concrete and glass office block
Democracy

A stormy start for Norfolk’s new chief officer

by Stephen McNair
2 September 2026
Water utility workers in high-visibility clothing at a barriered road excavation in London.
Economics

The nationalisation taboo

by Prof Richard Murphy
31 August 2026
Next Post
Depiction of artificial intelligence represented by an illustration of a human brain connected to a computer circuit board

Full disclosure: should you trust us with Artificial Intelligence?

SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Tags

Activism Art Brexit Cartoons Christmas Climate Community Conservation Conservatives Democracy Economy Elections Environment EU Farming General Election 2024 Government Health History Labour Letters Local government Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Polling Pollution Poverty Renewables Sewage Social care Something for the weekend Tax Trump Ukraine Voting Wealth Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

Crowdfunder

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771