The idea of healthcare in prison has always existed in a kind of cultural fog. It is a place where television tropes stand in for lived experience and where the gap between expectation and reality widens, leaving the most vulnerable to fall through. Recent hunger strikes by imprisoned members of Palestine Action have pushed the subject briefly into public view, though the attention has revealed how little most people understand about what healthcare behind bars actually looks like.
For many, the mental image of prison is borrowed wholesale from the screen. There is the prison cell in Porridge, conjured on a sound stage in Ealing, and the echoing corridors of The Italian Job or Paddington 2, filmed in the decommissioned Kilmainham Gaol, now a museum with a gift shop. These are prisons as set pieces. They are tidy, narratively convenient, and entirely untroubled by the mundane choreography of real life. None of them show the small, grinding rituals that shape a prisoner’s access to something as simple as a prescribed pill.
What the rulebook promises
In theory, the system is disarmingly straightforward. Every prisoner, regardless of offence or circumstance, is entitled to the same standard of healthcare as anyone outside the prison walls. Dental care is included. Treatment is free, though it must be approved by the prison’s healthcare team. There are no hospital wings as such, but many prisons maintain a handful of beds for those who need inpatient care. If there is an emergency, then 999 is called or prisoners are escorted to a local hospital for their appointments.
Back in 2020 the Nuffield Trust carried out a study looking at prisoner healthcare. Little has changed. Simple first aid to routine prescriptions are handled internally. More complex cases may require a specialist to visit them the prison. The system is designed to accommodate the realities of the population it serves: people arriving with long‑standing addictions, chronic illnesses, disabilities, or learning difficulties. In theory, specialist support follows them when they enter through the gates.
The reality: a tablet a day
To understand how theory diverges from practice, imagine a hypothetical prisoner. He is in his mid‑thirties, newly sentenced for a non‑violent, non‑sexual offence, with no previous convictions. He was sentenced less than a week ago and he is anxious, understandably, about the months ahead. Before sentencing, his GP prescribed him antidepressants.
How he receives that medication depends entirely on the category of prison he enters. As someone freshly convicted, he will be a Category B prisoner and held locally.
The prison categories
Category A prisons house those considered the highest risk to the public or national security. Category B prisons, where our hypothetical man will begin his sentence, are local or training prisons, the former are the default destination for the newly convicted. Category C prisons focus on training and resettlement, while Category D, the open prisons, allow eligible prisoners to spend much of their day outside the gates on work or education licences.
In a Category D prison, our man might receive a week’s supply of antidepressants to manage himself. In Category B, the process is ritualised. Each day, a knock at the cell door. A walk through a series of monitored thresholds, gates, stairwells, fire doors, each one staffed by an officer who checks that he is meant to be there while CCTV follows his every step. At the dispensing window, which resembles a post office counter, he gives his prison number and surname. The pharmacist hands him the tablet. Under the watchful eyes of both pharmacist and officer, he swallows it. Only then may he return to his cell.
A far from foolproof system
This assumes, of course, that the records are correct. If they are not – and errors are not unknown – he may receive the wrong medication, or none at all. For someone with severe mental health needs or a chronic condition, such lapses can be dangerous.
Women’s prisons and young offender institutions operate differently, with wings classified according to need rather than the A–D hierarchy, but the principle remains: the more secure the environment, the more tightly controlled the medication. This potentially means someone who has a mental health condition may have issues maintaining their medication, given the decreasing prison staffing levels.
Around one in five prisoners – those on remand awaiting trial or sentencing – are held in Category B conditions. The system described above is not an exception; it is the norm.
In the East of England, HMP Bedford, HMP Norwich, HMP Peterborough and HMP Chelmsford are considered local prisons and have remand prisoners.
Healthcare by contract
If our prisoner develops a non‑emergency illness such as a fever or a persistent cough, then he must first persuade an officer that he is unwell. Only then will he be escorted to healthcare, where he waits, under supervision, to see a nurse or GP. The rooms may resemble a GP surgery, but the atmosphere is unmistakably prison-like: every door monitored, every movement observed. Privacy exists only within the consultation itself.
Funding for prison healthcare in East Anglia comes from NHS England, but delivery is outsourced. Providers vary from prison to prison and change over time. Practice Plus Group, once part of Sodexo, operates numerous prisons and immigration removal centres. Spectrum Community Health CIC provides nursing, GP, mental health and pharmacy services in others. Virgin Healthcare has previously held contracts too. These arrangements are fixed‑term, and staffing levels are low. In such situations continuity of care is often the first casualty.
Consent and its limits
A persistent misconception is that prisoners must accept treatment. In reality, they retain the right to refuse, unless they lack the capacity to make the decision, which is a determination that typically requires a mental health assessment. The principle is simple: incarceration removes liberty, not bodily autonomy. The practice, however, is more complicated, especially in environments where trust is scarce and communication strained, and exacerbated by low staff numbers.
When the emergency is the system
Imagine now that our prisoner suffers a serious accident. An ambulance is called. A 2024 report by the Health Services Safety Investigation Body found that emergency response in prisons is hampered by a chain of miscommunication. Information from the scene passes through multiple handovers before reaching 999 call handlers, increasing the risk of errors. Ambulance services and the prison service lack formal channels for reviewing incidents together. Even the question of how an ambulance should enter a prison varies from site to site, leaving crews uncertain about security protocols.
These delays are not abstract. They shape outcomes. To the prisoners inside, it is evidence of a system designed to make them fail, that they have no value, yet to those on the outside, it is simply ignorance of the differing demands of prison and health. One requires isolation and security, and the other requires almost unfettered access.
When our prisoner finally reaches hospital, he remains under Category B restrictions. He has not been inside long enough to qualify for Release on Temporary Licence. He is therefore handcuffed to an officer or secured to the bed for the duration of his stay, a reminder that, even in a medical crisis, the logic of containment prevails.
The fiction we prefer
This is the reality of healthcare in British prisons. It is not cinematic but it is dramatic. It is a system of small frictions, bureaucratic delays, and structural blind spots; a system that functions adequately only when nothing goes wrong – and often not even then.
As long as the public imagination is shaped by fictional prisons, tidy, orderly, narratively convenient, the real ones will remain misunderstood. Without understanding, there can be no meaningful reform. Rehabilitation, already a fragile ambition, becomes harder still when the basic mechanics of care are obscured behind the door.
More from East Anglia Bylines
Friends of Bylines Network
There has never been a greater need for grassroots journalism that investigates the stories that really matter, holds power to account and champions the voices of everyday citizens. We are proudly powered by volunteers but what we do isn’t free.
STAND WITH US for independent, citizen-led journalism that makes democracy stronger, and you will even get some exclusive benefits.
