• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9771
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
East Anglia Bylines
Advertisement
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines
Home Party politics

The strange people who join political parties

Only a minority of people ever join a political party. But those who do influence our politics. So who are they?

Stephen McNair by Stephen McNair
8 February 2026
in Party politics, Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
LibDem conference

image by Joshua Brown. CC By-SA 2.0

Share on Bluesky

Only 2% of the British electorate are members of a political party. But, although numbers are small, those members do influence our politics. They can shape finances, campaigns, candidate and leadership selection, and potentially coalition choices in a fragmented party system. So, since 2015, the Party Members Project, based at Queen Mary, University of London, and Sussex University has been surveying members to understand who the members are, their activity, attitudes and beliefs. Their latest report, examining membership since the 2024 election, was published last month.

They find that, although membership of the two traditional main parties has fallen, there are still two broad blocs. On the left are Greens, Labour, Lib Dems, and on the right are Conservatives and Reform UK. But the members are remarkably similar, and unlike the general population – regardless of party – they are disproportionately male, middle‑aged, middle‑class, university‑educated and white, and living in southern England. But there is an exception: the social class profile of Reform members is much more like the country as a whole, and they are much less likely to be graduates.

Ideology, issues and identity

Unsurprisingly, party members have stronger political views than the electorate, and for them, the divide which emerged during the Brexit campaign still remains very visible. In the referendum, over 80% of members in the left bloc voted remain, while over 90% of Reform members and 60% of Conservatives voted leave.

When asked to place themselves on a left-right political spectrum, Greens were most firmly left wing with 80% choosing ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ left wing. By contrast, 45% of Reform members chose ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ right wing.

On the broad left, Greens, Labour and Lib Dem members strongly favour higher taxes and public spending. They are pro EU, broadly pro‑immigration, strongly supportive of net zero, sceptical of “separate spheres” for men and women, and more ambivalent about national history.

On the right, by contrast, Conservatives and especially Reform members are in favour of a low-tax small state, and in the Brexit referendum they overwhelmingly voted leave. They see immigration as too high, are more critical of net zero, more accepting of traditional gender roles, and are very proud of Britain’s past. But Reform members were by far the most committed to tax cuts and state shrinkage.

Leadership preferences

Asked what three qualities they wanted in a leader, members across all parties included ‘being in touch with ordinary people’. But, after that, there was a clear divide. Members in the left bloc all chose ‘a strong moral compass’, with Greens and LibDems also choosing ‘ability to empathise with others’, and Labour members choosing ‘being a good communicator’. By contrast, members in the right bloc chose ‘being able to stand up for the UK in dealing with other countries’ and while Conservatives wanted a leader who could ‘unite the nation’, Reform members prioritised ‘strength and authority’.

The option of ‘strong leaders who are prepared to break the rules in order to get things done’ was supported by two thirds of Reform members and 40% of Conservatives, but only a quarter of Greens, and only a tenth of Labour and LibDem members. Reform members were much more likely to choose qualities which psychologists call the ‘dark triad’, of narcissism, Machiavellianism and subclinical psychopathy.

Campaigning and activism

The report stresses that most members are not ‘activists’, even at election time, and that a small hard core does most of the work. In 2024, over half of Conservative members did nothing at all for their party, not even displaying posters. Greens, and especially Reform members, were most active in sharing and creating social media content, while Lib Dems remain notably strong on leaflet delivery. Conservative members were less likely to donate, with only about one in six giving money during the campaign, compared with roughly a quarter of Greens and Labour members and about a third of Lib Dem and Reform members.

Attachment, hostility and blocs

It is clear that membership creates a sense of identification but not blind loyalty. Around four‑fifths of members in most parties feel a bond when they meet a fellow supporter, but only Reform members feel personally insulted when their party is criticised. 

However, most have a strong sense of which party they feel most distant from. For Green, Labour and Lib Dem members that party is overwhelmingly Reform, while for Conservatives and Reform it is usually Labour, with the Greens as a secondary target. Conservative and Reform members are much less hostile to each other and, although they oppose a merger, they still behave as a loose right‑wing bloc.

A new model?

Overall, party members are all more like each other than they are like the rest of us. Most people have other things to do with their time and money. But it would appear that Reform is breaking the mould in a variety of ways. Ironically, although its members are more like its voters, and the electorate more generally, it is a limited company controlled by two directors (five have resigned). What that means remains to be seen.


More from East Anglia Bylines

Tactical voting poster
Democracy

Are we saying goodbye to the old two-party system?

by Mark Pack
9 January 2026
Dutch polling station sign
Democracy

How to tame the populists: lessons from the Netherlands

by Stephen McNair
2 November 2025
Composite photo of Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak
Democracy

Revealed: the ten most surprising facts from the 2024 election

by Prof Tim Bale
17 December 2025
Image of Farage against an image of a crumbling Britain, surrounded by all the politicians who have defected to Reform
Brexit

Who broke Britain?

by Stephen McNair
1 February 2026
Kotor Bay, Montenegro. In the near foreground is a church with a stonebuilt tower and a small octagonal dome, below it are the houses in Kotor, and beyond them is the very blue water of Kotor bay. All around the bay granite mountains rise steeply out of the water. This photo has clearly been taken from a position up the mountainside, as the photographer is on the same level as the top of the church tower.
Culture

Is Montenegro really the budget escape the reels promise?

by Purba Zannat
14 October 2026

 

Bylines Network Gazette is out!

The latest Bylines Network Gazette is out now. Become a Friend of Bylines Network or upgrade to a paid Substack subscription, and you will get access to a vital collection of citizen articles and stories.

Journalism by the people, for the people.

Tags: DemocracyGovernment
Previous Post

Politics has now run out of road

Next Post

Poem: Road rage

Stephen McNair

Stephen McNair

Stephen McNair is a member of the EAB editorial team, living in Norfolk. Now retired, he spent most of his career working on education policy, especially learning and work, at local, national and international level. He is Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of Surrey, and previously a Director of the National Institute for Adult Continuing Education. After 'retiring' he spent five years chairing a European research committee on demographic change.

Related Posts

Peterborough Town Hall
Democracy

They planned to rewire local government. Now they’ve pulled the plug

by Stephen McNair
12 October 2026
Entrance gates to RAF Honington’s Barnham Camp in Suffolk, with the camp sign beside the gates.
Immigration

Suffolk’s asylum referendum

by East Anglia Bylines
10 October 2026
Patriot Platform demonstration
Immigration

Who should women and girls really fear? It isn’t Abdul

by Stephen McNair
7 October 2026
Green Party leader Zack Polansky and former co-leader Adrian Ramsay standing by a stone wall in Walsham le Willows, with two canvassers, holding a handful of leaflets.
Anglia

Can one Green Party speak to Norwich and rural Suffolk?

by East Anglia Bylines
7 October 2026
A person with curly red hair sits at a kitchen table, viewing the Norfolk Family Court Information website.
Justice

New guide helps Norfolk families facing court without a lawyer

by East Anglia Bylines
6 October 2026
Next Post
Road sign to Maldon with a diversion sign beneath it

Poem: Road rage

SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Tags

Activism Brexit Cartoons Christmas Climate Community Conservation Conservatives Democracy Economy Elections Environment EU Farming General Election 2024 Government Health History Housing Labour Letters Local government Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Party politics Pecksniff Politics Polling Pollution Poverty Reform UK Renewables Sewage Social care Something for the weekend Tax Trump Ukraine Voting Wealth Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

Crowdfunder

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771