• Contact
  • About
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
East Anglia Bylines
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Opinion
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Politics Blog
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • East Anglia
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Opinion
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Politics Blog
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • East Anglia
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines

Beyond shibboleths – real action to eliminate Westminster sexism

Human rights lawyer Jocelynne Scutt looks at the place of women in the UK Parliament, and calls for action.

Dr Jocelynne ScuttbyDr Jocelynne Scutt
June 17, 2022
in Politics, UK
Reading Time: 7 mins
A A
Palace of Westminster

Palace of Westminster. Photo by Maurice via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The problem

Sexual harassment in the UK parliament is a challenge:

  • Demands for secretaries to purchase ‘sex toys’
  • Sexual propositioning at work
  • Sexual assault where a proposition is rejected
  • Sexual harassment
  • MP viewing pornographic images on his phone.

Westminster’s political intrigues might suggest stealth and concealed politicking, but sexual misconduct is flagrant.

What’s been done about the problem

As pointed out by Jenny Rhodes in this publication, addressing this as a breach of the Ministerial Code is not enough. Women say they “do not trust” the political parties to address a problem that appears to be endemic in the parliament and constituency offices.

The United Nations Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, known as CEDAW, is currently the subject of a campaign for its provisions to be wholly introduced into the United Kingdom as a Women’s Bill of Rights. The CEDAW People’s Tribunal has been tasked with exploring deficiencies in United Kingdom law that make a Women’s Bill of Rights essential.

In June 2021, it heard evidence of the Westminster problem. Witnesses emphasised that a culture exists within the polity that encourages abusive conduct toward and against women as candidates, as councillors and as Members of Parliament. The President’s Report canvasses measures suggested or adopted to address sexism in the political arena, exemplified by oppression and bullying, sexual harassment, sexist harassment, and assault. Reports and enquiries include the UK Gender Sensitive Parliament Audit 2018, resulting in a report identifying four barriers potentially making it more difficult for women to enter the House of Lords or become MPs:

  • Culture of parliament, highlighted in reports of bullying and harassment, and sexual harassment
  • Online threats and threats to physical security, in particular gender-based intimidation, harassment, and violence against female parliamentarians and female candidates
  • Challenges that working in parliament poses for family life, including unpredictability of business and potentially long hours
  • Financial impact of standing for parliament.

Dame Laura Cox’s Independent Inquiry Report on bullying and harassment of House of Commons staff recounted the experiences of members, members’ staff, and staff of members of the House of Lords. It highlighted “the growing menace of online and physical threats to parliamentary candidates, and in particular the gendered nature of the abuse aimed at women candidates”.

It appears that such incidents have not lessened despite Dame Cox’s report and recommendations.

The gender sensitive parliament audit in relation to this “menace” called for the parliamentary authorities “to take steps to ensure that MPs, members of the House of Lords and all staff are aware of the support available from their local police and the Parliamentary Liaison and Investigation Team to address abuse and threats via social media”.

The parties themselves have complaints procedures, and the parliamentary administrative arm has a complaints mechanism. An ‘independent’ complaints mechanism is alluded to – though it’s not clear exactly where, and how it has been established remains a mystery – and reference is made to police or lawyers as an avenue outside the walls of Westminster.

Hardly comforting.


More from East Anglia Bylines

Statue of Thomas Paine in Thetford, holding a quill in one hand and his book "Rights of Man" in the other.

Thomas Paine: time to look again?

October 14, 2023
Welcome to Cambridgeshire Road Sign

Bylines – focusing on Cambridgeshire

September 13, 2023

Internal party processes, complaints mechanisms, police, and legal action are designed to react to conduct once it has occurred. This approach and the strength and repetitious nature of the evidence appear to show that misconduct is inevitable. Surely action should aim to prevent the near certainty of exploitation and harm?

What needs to be done about the problem

Political parties need to be told firmly, through their bank accounts, that it is unacceptable to select candidates with exploitative proclivities. Public or state funding of elections would advance this goal, if dependent on all candidates for elected public office – local, devolved, or national government – undergoing compulsory training against discrimination, bullying, sexism, and sexist and sexual harassment.

This would mean that no candidate could be selected by any political party to stand – whether for a safe, swinging, winnable or unwinnable seat in a constituency, division, or ward – without having undergone training. And an hour of online, self-administered tuition will not do. Accredited programmes are essential. If parties devise their own, these should be accredited by a properly qualified agency or – for example – the Equality and Human Rights Commission (ECHR).

Of course debate exists around state or public funding of elections. The United Kingdom has funds for manifesto development and specified funds for opposition parties and in respect of devolved authorities. Public funding needs to go beyond these to the sort of provision that exists in other countries.

Australia has public funding of elections with reimbursement of election costs based on a basic number of votes cast for candidates; the Netherlands has funding for research; and in Germany funds match donations raised by parties. The German approach would at least ensure that political parties reveal the full extent of donations – something that some allege remains unclear in the United Kingdom – advancing transparency. Because the public purse is finite, limits on private funding would necessarily follow.

Concerns are raised regularly about the influence of private funding on political parties and elections. The Australian High Court and the United States Supreme Court have ruled that private funding of elections accords with ‘free speech’. The rich self-evidently have more funds, and these Court decisions astonishingly (to some) confirm their right to more free speech.

In politics, private bankrolling of political parties and candidates is poorly monitored or curbed. More money confers greater ‘freedom of speech’ – and obvious influence. This interferes with the democratic process. Surely a matter for concern?

If, to qualify for private funding of elections, political parties were required to ensure all candidates were certified as “trained against discrimination, bullying, sexism, and sexual and sexist harassment”, no doubt some might object, and strongly. Yet if the plague said to lurk in parliamentary halls is to be ended, post-event attention won’t do the trick.

Surely all political parties would welcome the certainty that at least all their candidates know just what constitutes unacceptable and illegal conduct and cannot prevaricate about it. Porn-on-phone-in-the-chamber and criminal acts constituted by power-driven sexual imposition surely mean it is time to act, and act effectively?


House of Commons
Democracy

Dozens of MPs investigated for sexual misconduct in toxic culture claim

byJenny Rhodes
June 2, 2022
Tags: Government
Previous Post

One in three Suffolk manufacturing jobs lost since Tories came to power

Next Post

Housing Association “Right to Buy” proposal is ‘just wrong’ say experts

Dr Jocelynne Scutt

Dr Jocelynne Scutt

Dr Jocelynne A. Scutt is a barrister and Human Rights lawyer, a filmmaker and writer. Her books include: Beauty, Women's Bodies and the Law – Performances in Plastic; Women, Lawand Culture – Conformity, Contradiction and Conflict; and Women and Magna Carta – A Treaty for Rights or Wrongs.

Related Posts

Demonstration in front of the Home Office by the organisation Global Justice Now in 2018 against the hostile environment. A group of people are holding a long banner that says 'End the hostile environment'.
Activism

Migrants organise to beat ‘hostile environment’

byMariam Yusuf
November 28, 2023
Original Gladstone Budget box
Business

Tories sink the economy while Labour’s response is dismal

byProf Richard Murphy
November 28, 2023
Geert Wilders smiling in a crowd
Democracy

Look to the mainstream to explain the rise of the far right

byAurelien Mondon
November 27, 2023
Photo of a the Chancellor's red budget case and a folder titled: "Autumn statement 2023"
Economics

Chancellor’s pre-election giveaways leave households £1,900 poorer

byEast Anglia Bylinesand1 others
November 23, 2023
Politics blog logo showing a fish-eye view of the Houses of Parliament.
Democracy

Politics Blog

byEast Anglia Bylines
November 21, 2023
Next Post
Row of 'for sale' signs on a grass verge

Housing Association “Right to Buy” proposal is ‘just wrong’ say experts

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

A Rwanda female nurse injecting a covi19 vaccine jab.

How Big Pharma is destroying global health

November 29, 2023
Artificial intelligence graphic

Artificial Intelligence in the newsroom: do we trust it?

November 29, 2023
Demonstration in front of the Home Office by the organisation Global Justice Now in 2018 against the hostile environment. A group of people are holding a long banner that says 'End the hostile environment'.

Migrants organise to beat ‘hostile environment’

November 28, 2023
Original Gladstone Budget box

Tories sink the economy while Labour’s response is dismal

November 28, 2023
Woman with hand held up to signify "stop"

Norwich Women’s Rights: urgent action needed

November 27, 2023
Geert Wilders smiling in a crowd

Look to the mainstream to explain the rise of the far right

November 27, 2023

MOST READ

Looking across Norwich Market towards the Norman Norwich Castle.

UK is always in our hearts, but it’s difficult to live there

November 24, 2023
Solar powered device that produces clean water and hydrogen. It's pictured on the deck of a punt on the river Cam, with St John's College's Bridge of Sighs in the background.

New floating device cleans water and produces hydrogen

November 22, 2023
Wine, cheese and bread at a street café in Paris

Wine, the pint bottle and European standards

November 23, 2023
Man reading a phone in bed

7.02: your first WhatsApp of the day…it’s AI wanting a word

November 24, 2023

Tags

Activism Anglian Water Brexit Business Cartoons Climate Community Conservatives COP26 Crime Democracy Economics Economy Elections Environment EU Farming Government Health History International Women's Day Labour Law Letters Local elections 2023 Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Poverty Sewage Social care Tax Trade Ukraine VAWG Wealth Welfare Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines

© 2023 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Opinion
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Politics Blog
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • East Anglia
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

DONATE

© 2023 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In