• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9771
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
East Anglia Bylines
Advertisement
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines
Home REGIONS Anglia

Rats from a sinking ship: how long is Johnson with us for?

The Tories have been overtaken by Labour in the polls and voters now prefer Starmer to Johnson

Stephen McNair by Stephen McNair
29 November 2021
in Anglia, Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Rats_from_sinking_ship

Richard Symonds, CC BY 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Share on Bluesky

A government losing its moorings

Boris Johnson has had a difficult few weeks. His appearance at the global COP conference was not the success he hoped for. He has been widely mocked for a speech to the CBI where he offered no clear policies, his jokes fell flat and he lost his place for nearly a minute. More importantly, he has seen his majority in Parliament whittled away on several critical issues. He has been forced into a humiliating U-turn on MP’s corruption, and his cancellation of the northern leg of High Speed 2 rail has upset many of his Northern MPs.  This week the party has been overtaken in the polls by Labour. If forced to choose, 42% of voters would choose Starmer as Prime Minister, compared to 36% for Johnson.

However, the government has a majority of 80 MPs, so he should be safe, despite rumbling discontent. In East Anglia, 51 of the 58 MPs are Conservatives. They are usually loyal to the party, so how have they voted on the critical issues, and are there signs of discontent?

In the last three months, three Parliamentary votes show an unhappy party in power.

15 September: Universal Credit

First, in September, the Labour Party forced a vote on whether to keep the £20 “uplift” on Universal Credit, which the Chancellor had introduced to ease the pressures of Covid.

Knowing that some Conservatives were concerned about the hardship which the end of the uplift would cause, and that a vote would not be binding, the party decided to avoid a vote, and ordered its MPs to abstain.

All the other parties voted to retain the uplift, and the vote was 253 to 0. In the East, a solitary Conservative MP, Peter Aldous (Waveney) rebelled and voted with the Opposition.

Peter_Aldous_ MP (Waveney): Official Portrait:
Peter Aldous MP (Waveney): Official Portrait

3 November: MPs’ misconduct

The second event was the attempt to change the rules on MP’s misconduct. This was intended to protect MP Owen Paterson, who had been found guilty of lobbying Ministers on behalf of firms who were paying him more than £100,000 a year. The government encouraged former Minister Andrea Leadsom to propose an amendment which would have suspended Paterson’s punishment while the whole system was reviewed.

The convention is that MPs have a free vote on disciplinary issues, but on this occasion the Conservative Party demanded that their MPs support it. Although many were unhappy, most held their noses and supported the amendment. It was carried by 250 to 232, with the government majority cut from 80 to 18.

In the Eastern Region, nearly a quarter of Conservative MPs did not vote for the amendment. Jackie Doyle-Price (Thurrock) and Richard Fuller (NE Bedfordshire) rebelled and voted with the Opposition, and ten did not vote.

  • Richard_Fuller_MP (North East Bedfordshire): Official Photo
    Richard Fuller MP (North East Bedfordshire): Official Photo
  • Jackie+Doyle_Price
    Jackie Doyle Price MP (Thurrock): Official Portrait

The day after the vote, public outcry forced the government to reverse its decision, leaving those who had voted for something many thought was wrong the day before, looking distinctly foolish.

23 November: the Social Care Cap

When he was elected in 2019, Boris Johnson promised that he had an “oven ready” plan for social care, an issue which has defeated successive governments for decades.  Almost two years later, a “plan” was revealed. It turned out to be only a plan to protect some people from having to sell their homes to pay for social care. It had nothing to say about the inadequate funding of social care, or the acute staff shortages, which mean that many people do not get the care they have been assessed as needing. 

When the detail was revealed, MPs discovered that the proposed “cap” on how much any individual would have to pay for social care was not only higher than previous recommendations, but also would disproportionately impact people with fewer assets, who would still have to sell their homes. For Labour, Angela Rayner said:

Tonight, Conservative MPs voted to break their promise that nobody would have to sell their homes to pay for their social care costs, and voted to hammer poorer pensioners to protect millionaires in mansions. It’s an inheritance tax on the north and a con, not a social care plan.

When it came to the vote, the Conservative majority was reduced from 80 to 26. Nineteen Conservative MPs rebelled, and at least 70 did not vote. Fifty seven of them are believed to have abstained (the remaining 13 are reported to have been “paired” by agreement with MPs from opposing parties).

Four of the Eastern Region MPs voted with the Opposition, and three more did not vote.

Ones to watch in the East

Fifteen of the 51 Conservative MPs in the East have rebelled against the government or abstained on a whipped vote at least once in the last three months. Seven are in what would normally be regarded as “safe” seats. It will be interesting to see how they all vote in future. (“Yes” indicates support for the government, “No” voting against. Those marked “Absent” did not vote – either actively abstaining or not present).

A government in danger?

On these three critical issues, almost a third of Conservative MPs in our region have failed to support the government on one or more occasions. It is clear that still more are angry about being forced to vote for the Leadsom amendment, only to find the government reversing its position a day later.

These are just three among many problems Conservative MPs face. They include shortages, rising prices, the crises in social care and in the NHS, the unresolved Northern Ireland border issue, tensions with France; and allegations of corruption over Covid contracts. Many of those newly elected in 2019 are right to feel nervous about their futures.

If a third of Tory MPs were to rebel on a single issue, their majority would disappear entirely. However, that is very unlikely, since those who rebel, do so on different issues; and if the party’s survival were to be under threat, they would certainly band together.

What it means for their present leader is, however, another matter. The Conservative party has a tradition of brutal dismissals of leaders it thinks are failing. It is not clear that Johnson will continue to pass the test if his recent record continues. It has been claimed that a dozen MPs have already signed letters calling for his removal. In our region, we could find Priti Patel, Liz Truss or Matt Hancock sharpening their knives.

Tags: ConservativesParty politics
Previous Post

The curious case of the NHS

Next Post

How the “woke” EU wants to ban Christmas

Stephen McNair

Stephen McNair

Stephen McNair is a member of the EAB editorial team, living in Norfolk. Now retired, he spent most of his career working on education policy, especially learning and work, at local, national and international level. He is Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of Surrey, and previously a Director of the National Institute for Adult Continuing Education. After 'retiring' he spent five years chairing a European research committee on demographic change.

Related Posts

Nigel Farage stands between an image promoting Channel 4’s undercover Reform investigation and the Bylines Network webinar, with Clacton Pier in the background.
News

As Channel 4 investigated Reform’s funding, Bylines was debating how to clean up politics

by East Anglia Bylines
4 September 2026
A crowd with one person in the foreground wearing a red baseball cap the wrong way around with Make America Great Again embroidered on it
Democracy

The MAGA paradox of good people and bad politics

by Guy Anthony Ayres
3 September 2026
External view of County Hall Norwich, a typical 1960s 'brutalist'-style concrete and glass office block
Democracy

A stormy start for Norfolk’s new chief officer

by Stephen McNair
2 September 2026
Water utility workers in high-visibility clothing at a barriered road excavation in London.
Economics

The nationalisation taboo

by Prof Richard Murphy
31 August 2026
This image shows a large radio telescope antenna at the Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory near Cambridge.
Anglia

Behind closed doors: discover Cambridge’s hidden spaces this September

by East Anglia Bylines
30 August 2026
Next Post
Woke to ban Christmas

How the “woke” EU wants to ban Christmas

SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Tags

Activism Art Brexit Cartoons Christmas Climate Community Conservation Conservatives Democracy Economy Elections Environment EU Farming General Election 2024 Government Health History Labour Letters Local government Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Polling Pollution Poverty Renewables Sewage Social care Something for the weekend Tax Trump Ukraine Voting Wealth Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

Crowdfunder

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771