• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9771
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
East Anglia Bylines
Advertisement
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series
No Result
View All Result
East Anglia Bylines
Home Politics

Do we want to rejoin the EU?

A year after Britain’s exit from the EU, the leave/remain divide still shapes British politics. It seems that we are not yet ready to rejoin.

Stephen McNair by Stephen McNair
23 January 2022
in Politics, UK
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
leavers and remainers

Leavers and Remainers - photo by Lloyd Davis via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Share on Bluesky

The EU Referendum in 2016 was a turning point in British politics. The division between “Leavers” and “Remainers” cut across traditional party lines. Three recent polls show that those divisions remain, with implications for our domestic politics and our future relationship with Europe.

Brexit remains a divider

Do British people regret the Brexit referendum decision, and do they want to rejoin the EU? Over the last two years, polling has shown a small lead for “join” over “stay out” (4-8 percent). In six polls last December the divide averaged 4 points in favour of join. However, the picture is more complicated than a single question can answer.

IPSOS-MORI have been tracking attitudes through a series of polls. They go beyond a simple in/out choice, exploring the implications for politics more widely. In December (before party polling swung sharply in favour of Labour), they found that “remain”/”leave” identities had weakened, but that they still matter. The proportion of people who describe themselves as either very strong remainers or very strong leavers has fallen from 55 percent to 39 percent, but 70 percent still say they still identify strongly as leavers or remainers.

Party identity matters less

By contrast, only 52 percent said that they identify strongly or very strongly with a political party. The proportion is higher among Labour voters (56 percent), but even among them, Brexit identity is stronger than party.

What do leave and remain mean?

Brexit identities were always about more than the European Union. The divide stands for two clusters of attitudes to a range of social and political issues, some of which matter more to many voters than membership of the EU. They are important precisely because they cut across the traditional political divide between left and right. On economic issues the traditional left right divide still holds, but peoples’ positions on social issues (liberal v authoritarian) link much more closely to their Brexit identity. In elections, this can throw up unexpected results. Electoral success may depend more than in the past on whether economic or social issues are seen as most important.

Brexit identities are also linked to age and education. In general, remainers are more highly educated, and younger. Those people tend to cluster in cities and large urban areas. Leavers are less likely to hold qualifications, are older, and more widely spread in towns and rural areas.

Was leaving a mistake?

Ipsos MORI found that few people are agnostic about Brexit. Eighty eight percent still have an opinion, and a small, but clear, majority – 54 percent – think that it was a mistake.

However, this group are divided on what they think should happen next. Two thirds of them agreed that “we should now work to make the best of Britain’s position outside the EU” , while one third believe that “we should concentrate on reversing the decision as soon as possible”. This suggests that whatever their view on the original decision, only a third of people are in favour of rejoining.

Around the same time, a poll by Redfield and Wilton asked a similar question: “Should the United Kingdom join the European Union or stay out of the European Union?” They too found a majority, although smaller (53 percent), for staying out. 

Redfield and Wilton confirmed the role of age in views on Brexit. Two thirds of those under 45 wanted to join, and two thirds of those over 45 wanted to stay out. As in the IpsosMori poll, most leavers wanted to stay out, but a sizable group of remainers (around 20 percent) agreed. Even among those who would vote to rejoin most don’t believe it is going to happen. Only 31 percent thought it likely that the EU would consider an application.

Electoral advantage

The electoral advantage for the Conservatives is clear. Their party policy is to stay out, and 88 percent of their voters agree. That is a clear single position which they share with all leavers, whatever party those people have supported in the past. By contrast, the opposition is divided, with around 40 percent choosing staying out, and the same proportion wanting to rejoin. The Conservatives have an added advantage under our electoral system, because the remain voters, who tend to be on the political left, are heavily concentrated in a small number of constituencies,, while leavers are spread more evenly.

Is Covid more important than Brexit?

Measuring people’s attitudes to the impact of Brexit is complicated by the Covid pandemic, which has caused massive upheavals and dominated the news for two years. To explore how far the economic and social difficulties of the last year are blamed on Covid rather than Brexit, the research centre, UK in a Changing Europe, are working with Redfield and Wilton to track changing attitudes.

They asked whether the impact of Brexit and Covid had been positive or negative on thirteen specific issues. The chart shows the net rating for each issue (negative percentage minus positive percentage). Covid was clearly seen as the main culprit in every case, and this was true for remainers as well as leavers. If Brexit is making an impact, it has yet to be recognised by most people.

What do people want to do?

UK in a Changing Europe also asked about people’s’ priorities for a post Brexit world. On some foreign affairs issues they prioritised the UK’s relationship with the US (notably on China and military security). But on most other issues, and especially trade, maintaining good relationships with the EU were seen as much more important.

Now is not the time

So these polls all suggest that, by a small majority, people regret the decision to leave the EU, and a clear majority want closer relations with Europe. But there is no significant majority for rejoining. Remain/leave is still a more important divider than party affiliation, and the Conservatives can still unite leavers behind the leave banner. Meanwhile, the remainers are divided about what they want.

If this is true, it would be political suicide at the moment, for a major opposition party to campaign for rejoin. Although there is some shifting of opinion, a substantial core of voters don’t want it in principle, and do not (yet) see the damage that Brexit has done. They are joined by a larger group who believe that rejoining is impractical, either because there is insufficient support, or because the EU would not consider an application.

It may be that, when Covid has ceased to dominate headlines, people will begin to see the damage of Brexit, and attitudes will change. This evidence suggests that the answer may not be never, but certainly not yet.


A divided Tory party
Climate

Farage returns to the fray: net zero is the new Brexit

by Stephen McNair
6 March 2022
Tags: BrexitEU
Previous Post

Pecksniff’s Diary

Next Post

Raw sewage in Diss river brings protests onto the streets

Stephen McNair

Stephen McNair

Stephen McNair is a member of the EAB editorial team, living in Norfolk. Now retired, he spent most of his career working on education policy, especially learning and work, at local, national and international level. He is Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of Surrey, and previously a Director of the National Institute for Adult Continuing Education. After 'retiring' he spent five years chairing a European research committee on demographic change.

Related Posts

Nigel Farage stands between an image promoting Channel 4’s undercover Reform investigation and the Bylines Network webinar, with Clacton Pier in the background.
News

As Channel 4 investigated Reform’s funding, Bylines was debating how to clean up politics

by East Anglia Bylines
4 September 2026
A crowd with one person in the foreground wearing a red baseball cap the wrong way around with Make America Great Again embroidered on it
Democracy

The MAGA paradox of good people and bad politics

by Guy Anthony Ayres
3 September 2026
External view of County Hall Norwich, a typical 1960s 'brutalist'-style concrete and glass office block
Democracy

A stormy start for Norfolk’s new chief officer

by Stephen McNair
2 September 2026
Water utility workers in high-visibility clothing at a barriered road excavation in London.
Economics

The nationalisation taboo

by Prof Richard Murphy
31 August 2026
Three identical images of Des Watts. Between each image is an arrow signifying movement and above each image is one of three logos, the first is Reform UK, the second is Advance UK and the third is the Conservatives.
Local government

Conservatives lost a seat to Reform – now they have it anyway

by John Elworthy
28 August 2026
Next Post
Diss sewage protest

Raw sewage in Diss river brings protests onto the streets

SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Tags

Activism Art Brexit Cartoons Christmas Climate Community Conservation Conservatives Democracy Economy Elections Environment EU Farming General Election 2024 Government Health History Labour Letters Local government Net zero NHS Norwich Opinion Our place in Europe Pandemic Party politics Pecksniff Politics Polling Pollution Poverty Renewables Sewage Social care Something for the weekend Tax Trump Ukraine Voting Wealth Wildlife Women
East Anglia Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in East Anglia and beyond.

East Anglia Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Health
    • Education
    • World
  • Politics
    • Local government
    • Justice
    • Activism
  • Climate
    • Environment
  • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Culture
    • History
    • Humour
    • Property
  • Business
    • Development
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Transport
    • Farming
  • ANGLIA
    • Bedfordshire
    • Cambridgeshire
    • Essex
    • Hertfordshire
    • Norfolk
    • Suffolk
  • Series

Newsletter sign up

Crowdfunder

© 2021-2026 East Anglia Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9771